|Overall rating: Acceptable||Nominated by: Michael von Preußen, 21 October 2012|
| Prose: Excellent|
I think the article's content speaks for itself in this regard. Relevant information is provided in clear and concise form for each of the relevant characters and groups of characters.
| Comprehensiveness: Excellent|
While the article is undoubtedly lengthy, being the longest article on the Wiki, I believe this length is wholly justified by the importance of the characters to the franchise. Each is summarized in a manner which is supported by the importance of their role in Clannad, providing a short overview of relevant information, while allowing readers the option of visiting the main articles, where they exist, to read further.
| Neutrality: Acceptable|
My first non-perfect rating for the article comes under neutrality. While I think it's safe to say the article is as neutral as it needs to be, there is here, as on almost all articles, a lack of reliable citations to verify this.
| Structure: Excellent|
As with Prose and Comprehensiveness, I think the article itself speaks for the Excellent rating here. Following an introduction summarizing the purpose of the page—an adequate use for a 'meta' page such as this, in my opinion—each of the characters or relevant groups of characters is given their own heading, each categorized under a section appropriate to their place in Clannad.
| Media: Poor|
Ah, media. Giving a subjective opinion, I believe the media, at least as far as the major characters goes, is more than adequate for the article, as not only does it illustrate the content, each image ties in with the others on the page by being a render (or extraction) of the illustrated character with a transparent background. Lack of such images for minor characters was what held me back from adding images to those lower down on the page. Unfortunately, following the rubric, the highest rating I could objectively give the article was a Poor rating, simply because the images are not captioned—and really, I don't think they need to be.
| Consistency: Excellent|
We have links, we have categories, we have a navbox, and we have a general style which matches other wiki articles. I don't see any issues here.
Although the nominations process was never fully finalized, I think it's high time we get a start on community-nominated articles for the main page, and as such, am making my first nomination. 〆vonPreußen／talk
- Support. 19:16, Friday, 26 October 2012 (ET)